stewart hu 80835138e9 Scaffold repo for implementation handoff

- README: orientation, doc map, target package layout (pointers only,
  no duplicated architecture content)
- CLAUDE.md: agent operating manual — invariants as code-review rules,
  conventions, do-not list, task reading order
- ROADMAP: M1-M5 with verifiable acceptance criteria, phase-2 fence
- GLOSSARY: canonical Chinese-term → code-name mapping
- docs/adr/: eight ADRs recording settled decisions and rejected
  alternatives
- docs/open-questions.md: consolidated TODO(业务) tracker by owner and
  blocking milestone
- .gitignore; untrack .DS_Store

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019u5SLNweVio6ozJX7yfxQr

🔮 View transcript: https://logs.lojong.info/s/e8u90k3t33w590r7b5y7yzqh

2026-09-01 21:13:00 -04:00

694 B

Raw Blame History

ADR-0007: Review (复盘) is a workflow, not a sixth agent

Status: accepted · 2026-09

Context: The proposal alternates between five agents and six business stages (review appearing as a sixth agent in some slides).

Decision: Review is a cross-agent workflow template led by the analysis agent, triggered by metering-data arrival. Its authoritative inputs are the ledger and event log; its outputs are ReviewFinding writebacks (semantic memory, reliability scores, envelope recommendations).

Rationale: Review is an analysis task; a dedicated agent would duplicate the analysis agent's role. Agent names are product personas, not service boundaries (peer review §4.1).

694 B Raw Blame History

ADR-0007: Review (复盘) is a workflow, not a sixth agent

694 B

Raw Blame History