# CLAUDE.md — agent operating manual Design docs live in `docs/` (00–13, Chinese). They are the specification; this file distills what is **binding** when writing code. When code and docs conflict, docs win — or write an ADR changing the doc first. ## Current phase Docs complete; M1–M5 implemented: schemas + contracts pipeline; deterministic services (ledger, stores, policy engine incl. dispatch rules, envelope with deviation-streak suspension, authority/permits, file-export + shadow + simulation gateways, events, lineage assemblers, revenue + power-balance simulation, review service, Case Desk, kill-switch hierarchy L0–L4 with loss breaker and abnormal-day protocol, shadow clearing/scoring, KPI computation); Python skill service (forecasts, bid MILP, report, potential assessment, dispatch optimization); L2 eval harness with committed baseline (synthetic data); Mastra runtime with the proposal-lifecycle safety chain (durable suspend/resume), situation / bid / award-decomposition / review / envelope-review / shadow-close workflows, trigger service (incl. shadow schedule and live-data ingestion), LLM port with LLM-down mode, Case Desk API with insight cards, KPI dashboard and breaker endpoints, shadow replay CLI (`npm run shadow -w @vpp/runtime`). Storage is file-backed reference semantics (ledger, time series, counters and repositories all persist under the data dir) — Postgres/Timescale adapters later. Phase 1 is feature-complete; what remains is running the shadow period on real Hubei data (`ROADMAP.md` M5 acceptance: 20+ consecutive days) and the governance steps that need business answers (`docs/open-questions.md`). Build order is ROADMAP.md (M1→M5). A skill change that moves an L2 metric must update the baseline in the same change (`npm run eval -w @vpp/evals -- --write-baseline`). Workflows are per-runtime factories (`createProposalLifecycle(ctx)` etc.) — never module singletons, or a second Mastra instance steals their context. Do not build phase-2 items (edge control links, federation, interaction/load-control agents, programmatic bid submission, acting on envelope-widening recommendations without the docs/03 envelope-review approval) unless explicitly asked. ## Hard rules (from docs/01 invariants — treat as review criteria) 1. **LLM never computes numbers.** Any numeric field in a `Proposal` payload must be a `{toolCallId, path}` reference into recorded tool-call lineage, dereferenced by the assembler. If you find yourself parsing a number out of LLM text into a payload, stop — that's the architecture's one forbidden move. 2. **No LLM in any control path.** Nothing under `services/` or the execution path may import or await an LLM call. Periodic workflows must run with the LLM backend down (invariant I6 — there is a test for this). 3. **External effects only via `(Proposal, ExecutionPermit)`.** Gateways/adapters never accept a bare plan. Permits are short-lived and revocable. 4. **AI cannot approve.** No code path may transition a Proposal to APPROVED/AUTHORIZED without either a matched envelope + passing checks, or a human `resume()` with an approver identity distinct from the origination chain. 5. **Everything auditable.** State transitions, tool calls, approvals, permits, and gateway receipts are event-sourced. Snapshots referenced by lineage are immutable. 6. **Schemas live in `packages/domain` only.** Python models are generated from `contracts/*.schema.json` — never hand-edit generated files, never define a business object schema anywhere else. ## Conventions - **Naming**: use the canonical code names in GLOSSARY.md. Do not invent new English names for domain terms that already have one. - **Language**: architecture docs Chinese; code, identifiers, comments, commit messages, ADRs English. - **Data representation** (docs/11 §3.3): money/energy/prices as fixed-point decimal **strings**; units in field names (`power_mw`, `price_yuan_per_mwh`); timestamps ISO8601 UTC; market intervals as `{date, interval_index}` with `interval_minutes` explicit; all IDs strings; enums UPPER_SNAKE string literals. - **Mastra**: do not trust memorized APIs — check `node_modules/@mastra/*/dist/docs/` (or the mastra skill) against the installed version before writing framework code. - **Testing floor**: every invariant above has at least one automated test; schema changes run golden-fixture validation on both TS and Python sides; policy pack changes require their rule tests green. ## Do not - Do not invent business parameters (market deadlines, envelope bounds, loss budgets, buffer coefficients). Check `docs/open-questions.md`; if a needed parameter is listed there, wire it as named config with a placeholder value and a `// OPEN-QUESTION:` comment, and say so in your summary. - Do not relitigate decisions recorded in `docs/adr/`. If a decision must change, propose a superseding ADR. - Do not create root-level summary docs that duplicate `docs/` content (no architecture.md / tech-stack.md — README points to the sources of truth). - Do not add a sixth agent, merge the safety chain into business workflows, or bypass the proposal lifecycle for "internal" effects — these were considered and rejected (see ADRs 0005–0007). ## Reading order for common tasks | Task | Read first | |---|---| | Domain schemas / contracts | docs/11, docs/00 §4, GLOSSARY.md | | Runtime, workflows, agents | docs/09, docs/02 | | Safety chain, approvals, permits | docs/03, docs/01 invariants | | Skill services (Python) | docs/05 §1–2, docs/11 §3 | | Anything touching money or bids | docs/07 (scenario), docs/13 §1 | | Eval harness | docs/12 |